New penalties for errors on tax returns and documents

HMRC has published new guidance on the new penalty provisions that will apply from April 2008.

HMRC states that it has designed the new penalties so that:

  • If people take reasonable care when completing their returns they will not be penalised.
  • If they do not take reasonable care errors will be penalised, and the penalties will be higher if the error is deliberate.
  • Disclosing errors before HMRC find them will substantially reduce any penalty due.

The new penalties initially apply to VAT, PAYE, National Insurance, Capital Gains Tax, Income Tax, Corporation Tax and the Construction Industry Scheme.

Further information can be found at:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/about/new-penalties/penalties-leaflet.pdf
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/about/new-penalties/faqs.htm  

UK - no longer tax competitive?

The CBI recently published a paper setting out their view on why the UK corporate tax system is uncompetitive.

Basically the CBI has four areas of concern:

  • The rising tax burden
  • The increasing level of complexity 
  • Growing uncertainty 
  • Threat to revenues.

In the CBI’s opinion the key principles for a corporate tax system are: 

  • Simplicity and clarity 
  • Certainty and stability 
  • Flexibility
  • Neutrality, i.e. tax should not distort business decisions.

In their view the rapid legislative change coupled with inadequate scrutiny and consultation has added to uncertainty for all taxpayers. At present, looking at the position for individuals on capital gains tax and on the changes for those not domiciled in the UK, it is hard to argue with their view.

If you would like to read more, you can find the full document at http://www.cbi.org.uk/ndbs/press.nsf/0363c1f07c6ca12a8025671c00381cc7/c9f94d05d0d0975b80257403003c66a6?OpenDocument.  

Budget 2008 - Previously announced

Much of what will be included in this year’s Finance Bill was known long before the Chancellor stood up to make his Budget speech. The main items of relevance to businesses are summarised here, with links to earlier postings:-

  • Corporation Tax – from 1 April 2008 the main rate will be reduced from 30% to 28% and the small companies’ rate increased from 20% to 21%. 
  • Homes abroad owned through a company – removal of a benefit in kind tax charge where the company is owned by individuals and the sole activity of the company is to hold an overseas property for occupation by the individuals and/or letting. 
  • Loss Relief – restriction of loss relief for interest payments made on certain qualifying loans in a partnership or a small company. Effective from 9 October 2007 this measure tackles a tax avoidance scheme which sought to advance the time at which relief could be claimed.
  • CGT reform for individuals & trusts (not for companies) – abolition of indexation allowances and taper relief, and introduction of a flat rate of 18%, (subject to new entrepreneurs’ relief) from 6 April 2008.
  • Research & Development – extension of SME tax relief schemes to include mid-sized companies with fewer than 500 employees.
  • Company gains on life policies – to be brought within the loan relationship legislation.
  • Capital Allowances – a range of new measures, including the reduction of annual writing down allowances to 20%, introduction of an Annual Investment Allowance of £50,000 and the reduction in the rate of allowances available for integral fixtures.
  • Leased plant & machinery – changes to bring the proceeds of sale from finance leaseback arrangement into charge to tax, and other anti-avoidance changes to long funding lease rules.

Entrepreneurs' Relief - Non-Qualifying Corporate Bonds

Anyone who has exchanged shares for non-qualifying corporate bonds (or non-QCBs, for short) needs to review their position carefully – before 5 April 2008.

Unless, in addition to the non-QCBs, they meet the criteria for the new Entrepreneurs’ Relief (e.g. they have been employed by the company that issued the loan notes and have owned at least 5% of the company’s ordinary shares throughout the twelve months prior to encashing the loan notes) they will face an 18% capital gains tax bill, rather than the 10% they might have expected when exchanging their shares.

It may be possible to benefit from the lower rate – but only by acting well in advance of the change.
If you think you might be affected by this and would like to discuss what you can do to keep your tax bill down, please contact Cathy Corns or me.

Entrepreneurs' Relief - Asset Sales

The new Entrepreneurs’ Relief, which comes into play from 6 April 2008, will (subject to certain criteria) reduce the capital gains tax due when shares in trading companies – or business interests – are sold.

It will not, however, be available where business assets are sold in isolation, rather than as part of the disposal of a business. This would include, for example, the sale of land owned and used by a farmer, unless the sale could be argued to be of a distinct business.

This is likely to be an area of debate with the Revenue and, in many cases, might only be settled by the Courts.

If you would like to discuss how this might affect you – and whether there is anything you can do to avoid this hike in the tax likely to be due – please contact Cathy Corns or me.

Some entrepreneurs benefit, but not their employees!

As you are only too well aware by now, the Chancellor announced a major reform of the capital gains tax (CGT) regime by setting a single flat rate of 18% from April 2008. Following a major outcry, the new entrepreneurs’ relief has been announced; this relief will reduce gains liable to CGT by 4/9ths, resulting in an effective rate of 10% on gains of up to £1m on disposals of a business by an individual.

But while business owners may be relieved by the introduction of a 10% rate of CGT on the first £1m of gain, their employees are likely to be far less happy as holdings of less than 5% will not qualify for relief.

The Government have encouraged companies to reward and motivate employees with shares but now exclude such employees from the new entrepreneurs’ relief.

There must be some logic – my problem is I just can’t see it!

Capital Gains Tax on sale of shares

There was a very interesting tax case (T M Collins and the Commissioner of HMRC) recently. Very briefly, two individuals sold their shares; one for cash and one partly for cash and partly for a contribution to his pension fund. HMRC argued that the contribution was taxable as part of the consideration – and lost.

This opens up some interesting possibilities going forward.

Retreat on Non-Dom Tax Changes

Please find below Lisa Spearman's latest blog on the Non-Doms issues, highlighted in our sister blog Tax Plus...

Following my blog of yesterday it now appears that the Chancellor has retreated on some of his proposals for the taxation of Non-Doms. Dave Hartnett, the Acting Chairman of HM Revenue and Customs has posted a letter on the Revenue website to clarify the Government’s intention in four areas where concerns have been raised.

According to the letter Hartnett wants….


“to make clear that the Government’s intention – which will be set out in legislation to be brought forward – has always been to ensure that:

  • those using the remittance basis will not be required to make any additional disclosures about their income and gains arising abroad. So long as they declare their remittances to the UK and pay UK tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances;
  • there will be no retrospection in the treatment of trusts and the tax changes will not apply to gains accrued or realised prior to the changes coming into effect;
  • money brought into the UK to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable;

    and

  • it will continue to be possible to bring art works into the UK for public display without incurring a charge to tax.

    In addition, we will continue to discuss with the US authorities how the £30,000 charge can become creditable against US tax.”



The full text of Hartnett’s letter can be found here.

This clarification is being interpreted as a retreat or a climb down by the Chancellor. However, a Treasury spokesman has been quoted as saying that the intentions have not changed it is just that the draft legislation has gone “slightly awry”. There are still a number of issues to be resolved and I expect we will have to wait until the Budget on 12 March to get further details.

Keep on watching this space.

Non-Doms - Making the pips squeak?

As the Chancellor’s proposals on taxing the so-called “non doms” (people born overseas or with foreign parentage) become clearer, it is apparent that his £30,000 annual levy is the tip of what could be a very large iceberg.

Media coverage over the past few days has highlighted the very real prospect of many non doms leaving the UK, as the potential impact of some of Mr Darling’s other ideas hit home.

 

As well as the annual charge, the loss of personal tax allowances and capital gains tax annual exemptions, non doms now face having to pay tax when they sell their homes in the UK. If the proposals become law, tax planning entered into many years ago will effectively become redundant on 6 April 2008, leaving non doms and their advisers with little or no time to try to put matters right.
And it seems a number have decided that, without the fiscal benefits offered until now (and the fear that this may be the first of a number of changes that adversely affect them) there is less reason to remain in the UK.

Many people will think that non doms have had it too good for too long and that these new rules are long overdue. However, if this prompts high earners, and high spenders, to leave the country, it could weaken the pre-eminent position of the City of London and slow this country’s economy. Is the price of fairness too great?

We are speaking with clients we believe may be affected by these new rules. If you think that the Chancellor’s proposals might impact on you, please contact us.

Solvent Liquidations - Tax Planning and other issues

A members' voluntary liquidation ("MVL") can be a tax efficient exit option for the shareholders of a solvent company.

Under current legislation shareholders receiving a distribution through an MVL or, where appropriate, using Extra Statutory Concession C16, may benefit from the business asset taper relief provisions.

The government has recently announced (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cgt/disposal.htm) that as from 6 April 2008 all capital gains will be taxed at a flat rate of 18% irrespective of the marginal income tax rate of the taxpayer concerned; and also that the current systems of taper relief and of indexation allowance will be abolished. Alongside these reforms the government will introduce a tax relief for many entrepreneurs that will deliver a 10% tax rate for up to the first £1 million of lifetime capital gains.

MVL

An MVL is a statutory procedure for realising assets, agreeing and settling liabilities and distributing surplus funds to shareholders. The majority of MVLs arise as a result of:

  • Tax planning - Taking advantage of changes in tax legislation when it may be appropriate to withdraw capital, or alternatively divide the business interest between shareholder groups
    and mitigate or defer tax liabilities (S.110 reorganisations).
  • Retirement planning - Shareholders who are considering retirement and wish to realise the value of their investment. A liquidator has the power to accept or reject claims of creditors and can disclaim onerous assets, such as leases, if appropriate.
  • Group reorganisations - The removal of dormant, non-trading or redundant companies in order to reduce costs, group restructuring or the release of capital for use elsewhere within the group.
  • End of specific purpose - The orderly closure of a company which has achieved the specific purpose for which it was incorporated.
    Tax planning

An MVL is not simply a case of passing a resolution and completing the winding up. It is important that the process is planned and the company suitably organised in order to minimise tax liabilities and maximise any commercial advantages. For example, consideration should be given to either making a pre-liquidation "income" distribution or a post-liquidation "capital" distribution.

Pre-appointment planning is particularly important at present, as those anticipating paying CGT
at a certain rate, whether 10% or 40% or some rate between, may find a different rate applying to their capital gain after 6 April 2008. Individuals who do not benefit from the current business asset taper relief provisions are likely to be better off under the new rules unless they have substantial indexation allowance. Other tax related matters to consider prior to liquidation:

A new 12 month accounting period for corporation tax purposes begins at the date a company resolves to wind up.

  • The surrender of trading losses by way of group relief.
  • The realisation of capital gains and their offset.
  • The tax consequences of moving assets between group companies.

Other issues

  • The Companies Act 2006 (http://www.dti.gov.uk/bbf/co-act-2006/index.html) introduces changes to company law that will directly affect directors and shareholders. From 1 October 2009 the time limit for making an application to Court for the restoration of a liquidated company to the register after dissolution will be six years. The time limit is currently two years. The six year time limit will also apply to companies struck off and dissolved by application of the directors (presently 20 years). It remains essential, therefore, that thorough due diligence is undertaken to identify and deal with all actual and contingent liabilities and onerous contracts to avoid any future action against the company and its directors.
  • When a company is struck off owning property, that property vests in the Crown as 'bona vacantia'. As share capital and non-distributable reserves (including the share premium) cannot be repaid otherwise than by liquidation or the buy back of shares, or Court Order, the equivalent assets will pass to the Crown. The Office of the Treasury Solicitor has confirmed
    that where a company has been struck off by application of the directors it will waive the right to recover any unauthorised distribution of less than £4,000.

An MVL can be a tax efficient and cost effective way of bringing a company to a formal end. An alternative may be to make an application to Companies House for striking-off.

Capital Gain Tax - Non business assets

Last week, the Chancellor announced details of his so called “Entrepreneurs’ Relief”, the replacement for taper relief, for business owners facing an increase of more than 80% from 6 April 2008.

It would be easy, given all the hype surrounding this new relief, to forget the position for people holding assets that would never have qualified as “business assets” and the 10% capital gains tax rate. By this, I mean assets such as shares in investment companies, residential “buy to let” properties and others not used in trading businesses.

In some respects, their position is more complicated, as the reduction in capital gains tax rates will be offset by the abolition of indexation allowance (the effect of inflation before 1998) and the decision as to the best time to sell may not be so obvious. It is certainly not as simple as saying that the headline rate falls to 18% so matters are automatically better after the changes come into force.

You may think it is now too late to sell before 6 April 2008 – but this is not necessarily the question that needs to be answered.

If you would like to discuss how the new rules might affect you and what you might be able to do to ameliorate any negative effects, please contact Cathy Corns or me.

Capital Gains Tax planning point - ends 5 April 2008

HMRC has recently confirmed one very important point on assets that have been owned for a number of years. Such assets will have accrued a substantial amount of indexation relief (over 100% to date on assets held on 31 March 1982). Where an individual owns such assets on 5 April 2008 the indexation relief is irretrievably lost.

However HMRC have now confirmed (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cgt/faqs-cgt-reform.htm) that where an asset is transferred to a spouse or civil partner on a no-gain no-loss transfer the indexation relief is captured as part of the new owner’s base cost for tax purposes. This is an important planning possibility.

Regrettably though life in tax is never 100% straightforward – if the original owner would qualify for the new entrepreneurs relief and the new owner would not then the value of the historic indexation has to be compared with the value of the new relief before any transfer is made.

Capital Gains Tax - Commercial property

The Chancellor’s announcement of the new “Entrepreneurs’ Relief” from 6 April 2008 appears to herald a marked change in the tax position of owners of commercial property.

Though the details have yet to be formalised, it seems that unless the property is let to the owner’s business – or to a company in which the owner has at least a 5% shareholding – the minimum tax rate on selling that property will increase to 18%.

Since 2000, anyone owning a commercial property used by an unquoted trading company would qualify for the higher rate of taper relief and could potentially pay only 10% capital gains tax on selling the property after two years.

It seems unlikely that this change will create a false market in such property before 6 April 2008 but there may be steps that can be taken to negate some of the impact of this effective tax increase in the time available.

If you would like to discuss what might be possible, please contact Cathy Corns or me.

Entrepreneurs' Relief

As we reported last week, Alistair Darling has released details of what he and HM Revenue & Customs are calling “Entrepreneurs’ Relief” (which probably sounds better than the U-turn that many consider it to be).

Under this new relief, which is set to become law from 6 April 2008, the self-employed, employees and directors will qualify for a 10% tax rate on selling their interest in the trading business or company for which they work.

 

Not surprisingly, a detailed review of the Chancellor’s proposals shows the relief to be more complicated and less attractive than it might initially appear:

  1. The relief applies only on the first £1million of lifetime gains, which is markedly less generous than the taper relief regime it replaces and is unlikely to be of great benefit to the serial entrepreneur. 
  2. At the other end of the scale, the requirement for an employee to hold at least 5% of the company’s shares means that many lower paid staff at companies such as Tesco (so often referred to as an example of the small investor benefitting from taper relief) will be excluded from the Chancellor’s new scheme. 
  3. The shares, or interest in the business, must have been owned for at least one year, which does little to encourage long term investment. 
  4. There is still no allowance made for inflation on those assets owned before April 1998, the impact of which it is easy to underestimate. A husband and wife farming partnership, whose farm was worth £1,000,000 in 1982, could face a tax bill of £38,000 if they sold their farm for £2.5million before 6 April 2008. Waiting – or being forced to wait – until after the end of this tax year would increase the tax liability to £148,000. The fact that it would have been nearly £270,000 but for the new relief is unlikely to be of great comfort to a couple who have seen their payment to HM Revenue & Customs increase by nearly 300%.

In many cases, the changes will have removed the urgency of business owners to try and sell before 6 April 2008, which will in turn potentially prevent a false market. But for others – especially those who have owned their business for many years - it may still be worthwhile looking at ways to benefit from the more generous regime in force until then.

If you think you may fall into the latter category and would like to discuss how the new rules might affect you, please contact Cathy Corns or me.

Reducing administration

Is a key issue for most business particularly where tax is concerned. But did you know that HMRC run a committee just to look at the issue. (The question of another layer of administration reducing administration can be left for now I think). The last minutes were interesting reading – in particular –

“Some members expressed disquiet at the way that the PBR CGT changes had been badged as simplification measures. They saw the changes as damaging for business and for the credibility of the simplification and admin burdens agenda ….. this was not simplification from a business perspective … the changes did simplify the tax; but that this was a wider policy change and more than a simplification. “

So now we know – simplifying tax must make it simpler for business.

One other area where the committee seemed to share my concerns is on income shifting: -

“There was still a degree of confusion for smaller businesses around IR35 and a question mark over whether this legislation had achieved what was intended. The planned legislation on income shifting was likely to increase the difficulty.

Any legislation needed to be properly proportionate to the risk at which it was targeted – what is the legislation designed to protect and is it capturing the right people in the right way?”

Sadly the issue was flagged but not resolved.


The future areas where simplification is a target appear to be taxation of benefits in kind and the associated company rules.


This appears to be one to watch – if you want to read more click here.

Update on Capital Gains Tax changes

According to the Financial Times - there is a meeting today finally to decide on the much heralded (and on which the details are long awaited).

We will report on the changes once they are eventually published – watch this space.

Draft Legislation for new Non Domicile rules now available

Below is a blog which you might find of interest from my colleague and fellow partner Lisa Spearman who contributes to our sister blog Tax Plus blog.

After some considerable wait HM Revenue & Customs and customs have finally published the draft legislation covering changes to rules for taxing UK residents who are not domiciled in the UK.

These are more wide ranging than expected and will have a significant impact on not only Non Doms but also beneficiaries and settlors of offshore trusts whether or not they are Non Doms.

There is a significant amount of new legislation to be considered and it may be amended before (or after!) 5 April 2008. Some points that are proposed are.

  • Non Doms who have been here for seven years (out of ten) will have to pay £30,000 a year to elect for the Remittance Basis.
  • All Non Doms claiming the remittance basis will lose personal allowances and capital gains tax annual exemptions. Subject to a de minimis limit of £1,000 of overseas income / gains.
  • Bringing non cash items to the UK such as works of art, cars, furniture, and jewellery will be treated as a remittance after 5 April 2008. If those items were purchased with overseas income or gains then the remittance could be taxable in the UK. If such items have already been brought into the UK and are used after 5 April 2008 the legislation as presently drafted, indicates that there will be a remittance which will be taxable.
  • Beneficiaries of offshore trusts who receive capital payments may be taxable on capital gains arising in the trust that have arisen as far back as 17 March 1998 (yes ten years ago!) or gains made at some point in the future.

There is much more to consider but if you are Non Domiciled or have an interest in an offshore trust it would be sensible to contact your accountant now. There are only a few weeks before the new rules become effective.

Not this week Darling...

Below is a blog which may be of interest, written by my colleague Barry Hallam for our sister blog Tax Plus...

Following reports of further meetings with business leaders it now seems that Mr Darling’s long delayed announcement regarding the capital gains tax regime will not now appear until next week according to the FT.

We are also still waiting for the draft legislation for the new Residence and Domicile rules. In a little over 10 weeks both sets of new rules are due to take effect and the uncertainty makes it very difficulty to plan.

While we are waiting...

Below is a piece written by my colleague Barry Hallam on our sister blog Tax Plus.

Although January is traditionally the busiest time of year for tax professionals we are eagerly awaiting further details on the proposed changes in the rules for Residence, Domicile and Capital Gains which are rumoured to be available next week.

While we wait, HM Revenue and Customs have found the time to publish three consultative documents concerning proposed changes to HMRC powers and have indicated the intention to draw up a Taxpayers' Charter.

The three documents run to over 150 pages and can be found on the Revenue website. The three documents are:


  • "Modernising Powers, Deterrents and Safeguards: Payments, Repayments and Debt: Responses to Consultation and Proposals.”
  • "Modernising Powers, Deterrents and Safeguards: A New Approach to Compliance Checks: Responses to Consultation and Proposals.”
  • "Modernising Powers, Deterrents and Safeguards: Penalties Reform: The Next Phase."

The first document on payment, repayment and debt proposes changes to the statutory framework that allows HMRC to collect tax debts and ensure that taxpayers pay what they owe; the second document contains proposals on compliance checks and puts forward proposals for a new framework for HMRC to check that taxpayers are paying the right amount of tax and claiming the right amount of repayments; and finally, the civil penalties document puts forward proposals for extending the new statutory framework in Finance Act 2007 for charging civil penalties to all other taxes, levies and duties that HMRC is responsible for, except for Tax Credits.

There is no mention in the documents of the Taxpayers Charter but the accompanying Press Release quotes Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Jane Kennedy, as saying:

"The Government is committed to ensuring that the tax system is useable and accessible and a Taxpayers' Charter will provide a good reference point for taxpayers.”

Those with long memories will remember that both the Inland Revenue and HM Customs and Excise introduced Taxpayers Charters in the 1990s but these disappeared after a few years when it became apparent that neither organisation could keep to them!

Watch this space for the more pressing details on Residence, Domicile and Capital gains.

UK not in line with Europe's position on Capital Gains Tax?

A group of UK companies is considering appealing to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) against tax charges imposed on UK businesses that relocate their tax residence to another EU member state on the grounds that this is a breach of European Community Law. The ECJ has already indicated that taxation of capital gains on assets transferred to another Member State infringes the principle of freedom of establishment (de Lasteyrie du Saillant v Ministere de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (Case C-9/02) [2005] STC 1722). The ECJ has further suggested that taxpayers are discriminated against by being subject to immediate taxation in their Member State of origin on capital gains not yet realised, if no such taxation occurs in similar domestic situations.

The point is that, under current rules, a UK company that shifts its headquarters or board to another country, and in so doing ceases to be UK tax resident, is deemed to have disposed of all its assets at market value and is liable for tax on any gains from this ‘sale’. However, if an individual taxpayer moves to another Member State before selling his assets, his original state of residence is likely to lose the taxing rights on the capital gains which have accrued to those assets but there is no individual exit charge.

Some Member States have attempted to deal with this issue by taxing accrued (but unrealised) gains at the moment of transfer of residence by the taxpayer.

However, if this is done double taxation could arise, for example, if the exit State calculates the capital gains at the moment of deemed disposal at the time the taxpayer leaves the country and the new State of residence taxes the whole capital gain from the acquisition up to the moment of actual disposal.

The government is believed to be in informal talks with the European Commission on exit charges and is consulting with other member states on how to co-ordinate exit charge laws.

Darling Delays Capital Gains Revisions to New Year

I wanted to draw your attention to a blog posted by my colleague Barry Hallam on our sister blog Tax Plus blog...

It is being reported that Chancellor Alastair Darling will not be able to announce his revised proposals in the three weeks that had been promised. He told MPs today:

"It is not now going to be possible to conclude that process until the New Year,"

This is because he needed more time to study various, differing representations.

Alistair Darling addresses the Confederation of British Industry (CBI)

In his address to the CBI conference earlier this week Alistair Darling announced that he does listen to businesses and intends to publish his final capital gains tax proposals "in the next three weeks".

Mr Darling accepted that his proposals to introduce a single rate of capital gains tax had been controversial but stated that the government was working with business organisations and listening to the views expressed. He further confirmed his aim for a simplified tax system and stated that capital gains should pay a “fair” (?) rate of tax but stated that the government also wanted to reward investment. His view appeared to be that by taxing gains at a lower rate than income and setting that rate at a competitive level world-wide this had actually been achieved. However he then reiterated that he would publish the proposals shortly.

I have no idea from the speech whether the rate will change, or not (if I had to guess I would say not), whether there will be a distinction between business and non-business assets (again my guess would be not) or whether he will introduce something to help small business owners (probably). One of the key things he could (and in my opinion should) address is the cost of the loss of indexation on assets held at March 1982, currently worth more than 100% of the value at that date (my guess is unlikely to be changed).

All I can say is watch this space!

The speech is available in full by clicking here.

Government retreat on key tax reforms

According to The Times the Government are looking to mitigate the changes proposed in the Pre Budget Statement three weeks ago. Apparently the plan is to introduce a form of retirement relief of £100,000, aimed to assist small businessmen who are selling up and retiring. As of the time this was posted the HMRC website had no details on this and so we do not know if it is accurate and, if so what is meant by small or retiring or what tests have to be met to qualify.

Any mitigation of the tax is welcome and I will be in touch again when more details are available.

Changes to Capital Gains Tax - Have Your Say

If you are concerned about the proposed change to a new flat Capital Gains Tax rate of 18% you may be interested to know that a petition has been opened on the Downing Street website.

If you wish to add your name to this the link is - http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp  

Pre Budget Report 2007 - Capital Gains Tax (CGT)

From 6 April 2008 there is to be a dramatic change in the calculation of Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Essentially there will be a flat rate of tax of 18% based on the difference between sale proceeds and cost. This applies irrespective of the type of asset held; the length of time held; removes relief for indexation totally (effectively halving the tax base cost for assets held pre March 1982) and removes a few other mitigation measures.

The Chancellor confirmed that the existing rules will apply until 5 April 2008. Depending on whether you have business assets that qualify for full taper relief (an effective rate of tax of 10%) or non-business assets (best possible rate 24%) you have either a five month window to realise a gain or a short period to wait before you sell.

This is complicated and you need to review the CGT position on assets urgently.

The changes outlined do not apply to companies.

Rumours

There has been a lot of press speculation recently that, following the calls for a shake up in the tax breaks enjoyed by the private equity industry, the Chancellor may change capital gains tax for everyone.

According to the FT, the Chancellor is considering an increase in the effective rate of capital gains tax from 10% to 20% for businesses assets e.g. shares in unquoted trading companies and partnership goodwill. Additionally, he is apparently proposing an increase in the taper relief period from two years to five years.

The reforms were allegedly discussed in meetings between Treasury officials and private equity representatives. This may be a relief to the private equity industry but, unless some distinctions are made, it is very bad news for other business owners.

Watch this space!